What Went Wrong In Flint
Organisation: FiveThirtyEight (United States)
Publication Date: 04/09/2016
Size of team/newsroom:large
DescriptionAn in-depth analysis of how officials in Michigan ignored signs that Flint’s water system was giving its residents lead poisoning. Using FOIA’d documents and data sets, this carefully reported article reported on Flint’s crisis from the ground, mixing narrative storytelling with data analysis to show how officials looked the other way, even when the evidence in front of them was undeniable. This was an investigative news story for a general audience – anyone who had read snippets of news about Flint but was still seeking deeper understanding of how we had arrived at such a harrowing moment.
What makes this project innovative? What was its impact?There was a lot of coverage of the Flint crisis, but little that reported from the ground and interrogated the data surrounding the case. The article’s data analysis demonstrates how easy it is for officials to claim a city hasn’t passed lead-regulation thresholds even when it has, and its data visualization shows how glaring the differences were between officials’ version of events and the version from Flint’s amateur scientists. Those charts mixed with shoe-leather reporting show both how people were poisoned, and who those people are.
Technologies used for this project:We did our data analysis in Excel and R, our mapping using QGIS, and our chart-making in Illustrator.
You have to be connected to contribute
You have to be connected to follow
Leave this project and no longer be informed about this project
By joining this project, you will be informed by email when an update or a new contribution is posted on the website.
Thank you for your active participation !
The GEN Community Team